The Crowd Tape

What the street is doing, not what I think

What top X accounts are doing, not what I think

← Back to dashboard

XLF

State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETFPartly aligned
Close 55.28 (2026-10-15)28 days -1.1%1Y +3.8%28 d mentions 10

Stance mix of tracked accounts 8 accounts mentioned it · latest post counts

BullishNeutralNo stanceBearish
Bullish
1
Neutral
3
No stance
0
Bearish
4

Consensus and splits Reasons (analyst tagged) and views from the past 14 days

Bull case
  • 1Fundamentals
  • @scottmelker: @scottmelker quotes Jim Cramer: it's strange to see universally negative reactions to bank quarters that contained plenty of positives.
Bear case
  • 3Macro
  • 1Fundamentals
  • @steve_hanke: @steve_hanke: the US bond rout has pushed rates up and damaged bank balance sheets; US banks face $326.7 billion of unrealized losses, up for 2 straight quarters.
  • @PeterSchiff: @PeterSchiff: mortgage lenders will lose more than in the GFC, when realized losses were about $450 billion; $8.3 trillion of fixed rate mortgages average 4.6% with 25 years left, and with rates at 7.5% mark to market losses are already about $2 trillion.
  • @LukeGromen: @LukeGromen: consumers under 49 owe $10T in consumer debt and are most exposed to AI income disruption; 10% losses would be $1T, about 40% of US bank equity capital (~$2.6T).

Partly aligned. Accounts are on both sides; see the two columns above for where they differ.

Current views Each account’s latest stance and reasoning; change is vs that account’s previous call
Bearish First call
Macro · Medium term · @steve_hanke: the US bond rout has pushed rates up and damaged bank balance sheets; US banks face $326.7 billion of unrealized losses, up for 2 straight quarters.
2026-10-15 21:37 HKT Original post ↗
Bearish First call
Macro · Medium term · @PeterSchiff: mortgage lenders will lose more than in the GFC, when realized losses were about $450 billion; $8.3 trillion of fixed rate mortgages average 4.6% with 25 years left, and with rates at 7.5% mark to market losses are already about $2 trillion.
2026-10-15 21:18 HKT Original post ↗
Bullish First call
Fundamentals · Short term · @scottmelker quotes Jim Cramer: it's strange to see universally negative reactions to bank quarters that contained plenty of positives.
2026-10-15 12:30 HKT Original post ↗
Brian Shannon, CMT @alphatrendsViews ›
Neutral First call
Basis not tagged · Daily end-of-day video promo for X subscribers covering $SPY $QQQ $IWM $SMH $TLT Bitcoin $GLD $XLF $XLE.
2026-10-15 04:23 HKT Original post ↗
Bearish First call
Macro · Long term · @LukeGromen: consumers under 49 owe $10T in consumer debt and are most exposed to AI income disruption; 10% losses would be $1T, about 40% of US bank equity capital (~$2.6T).
2026-10-15 02:36 HKT Original post ↗
Danielle DiMartino Booth @DiMartinoBoothViews ›
Bearish First call
Fundamentals · Medium term · @DiMartinoBooth quotes @AdamJJosephson: banks' credit loss provisions and net charge offs as a % of loans have fallen for 2 years, but concluding credit quality is good ignores possibly ongoing loan modifications.
2026-10-14 02:40 HKT Original post ↗
Neutral First call
Technicals · @bespokeinvest notes Financials $XLF and Technology $XLK are both reversing from their opening levels, adding that there is still a lot of the day left.
2026-10-13 22:08 HKT Original post ↗
Ryan Detrick, CMT @RyanDetrickViews ›
Neutral First call
Basis not tagged · Financials have been crushed since the Fed hiked. $XLF found support near the late June lows and 50% retracement of the recent rally. Nice one from @FrankCappelleri in his note yesterday.
2026-10-10 20:20 HKT Original post ↗
Background How the narrative evolved over time, for context on current views

By week Last 4 weeks

  • 10/10–10/16 · 10 posts · Bull 1 / Bear 4
    @steve_hanke: @steve_hanke: the US bond rout has pushed rates up and damaged bank balance sheets; US banks face $326.7 billion of unrealized losses, up for 2 straight quarters. (Bearish)
  • 10/3–10/9 · 0 posts · Bull 0 / Bear 0
    No discussion
  • 9/26–10/2 · 0 posts · Bull 0 / Bear 0
    No discussion
  • 9/19–9/25 · 0 posts · Bull 0 / Bear 0
    No discussion

Key views and how they evolved Newest first

XLF Bearish2026-10-15 21:37 HKTOriginal post ↗

@steve_hanke: the US bond rout has pushed rates up and damaged bank balance sheets; US banks face $326.7 billion of unrealized losses, up for 2 straight quarters.

See original

The US bond market rout has sent bond prices down, interest rates up, and damaged bank balance sheets big time. https://x.com/Barchart/status/2110542951038210078?s=20

Reasoning: Macro · Medium term

XLF Bearish2026-10-15 21:18 HKTOriginal post ↗

@PeterSchiff: mortgage lenders will lose more than in the GFC, when realized losses were about $450 billion; $8.3 trillion of fixed rate mortgages average 4.6% with 25 years left, and with rates at 7.5% mark to market losses are already about $2 trillion.

See original

Mortgage lenders will lose far more during the developing mortgage crisis than they did during all of the GFC. From 2007–2010, realized losses on defaulted mortgages totaled about $450 billion. There is currently about $8.3 trillion in outstanding fixed-rate mortgages with an average rate of 4.6% and 25 years left to maturity. Given that current rates are 7.5%, the mark-to-market losses on those mortgages are already about $2 trillion. When rates rise to 8.5%, the loss will rise to $3 trillion! That means even without a single default, on paper mortgage lenders have already lost over four times more than they lost during the GFC. That loss will grow to nearly seven times as much when mortgage rates hit 8.5%. Worse, during the GFC, since mortgage rates plunged, lenders had mark-to-market gains on all the outstanding mortgages that did not default. Since only 10% of the mortgages defaulted, those unrealized gains totaled about $1.75 trillion. That provided a huge cushion that today's mortgage lenders no longer have. In fact, when mark-to-market gains were taken into account, mortgage lenders actually made $1.3 trillion during the GFC. The current situation is therefore orders of magnitude worse. The impending disaster was created by the Federal Reserve holding interest rates so low for so long, and the FHA and GSEs guaranteeing 30-year fixed-rate mortgages, which allowed borrowers to lock in such low rates for such long durations. That sowed the seeds for the perfect storm

Reasoning: Macro · Medium term

XLF Bullish2026-10-15 12:30 HKTOriginal post ↗

@scottmelker quotes Jim Cramer: it's strange to see universally negative reactions to bank quarters that contained plenty of positives.

See original

JIM CRAMER ON BANK EARNINGS: "FRANKLY, IT’S STRANGE TO SEE SUCH UNIVERSALLY NEGATIVE REACTIONS TO A SET OF QUARTERS THAT CONTAINED PLENTY OF POSITIVES."

Reasoning: Fundamentals · Short term

XLF Neutral2026-10-15 04:23 HKTOriginal post ↗

Daily end-of-day video promo for X subscribers covering $SPY $QQQ $IWM $SMH $TLT Bitcoin $GLD $XLF $XLE.

See original

I do an end of day video like this (and a lot more) every day for X subscribers for just $10/month $SPY $QQQ $IWM $SMH $TLT #Bitcoin $GLD #GC_F $XLF $XLE https://x.com/alphatrends/creator-subscriptions/subscribe

Image 1 ↗

Reasoning: Not tagged by analyst

XLF Bearish2026-10-15 02:36 HKTOriginal post ↗

@LukeGromen: consumers under 49 owe $10T in consumer debt and are most exposed to AI income disruption; 10% losses would be $1T, about 40% of US bank equity capital (~$2.6T).

See original

Consumers <49 years old owe $10T in consumer debt (IMO <49 most likely to have incomes disintermediated by AI). If AI does what its proponents say it will, 10% losses on that $10T = $1T = ~40% of total equity capital of the US banking industry (~$2.6T). via @Kathleen_Tyson_

Reasoning: Macro · Long term

XLF Bearish2026-10-14 02:40 HKTOriginal post ↗

@DiMartinoBooth quotes @AdamJJosephson: banks' credit loss provisions and net charge offs as a % of loans have fallen for 2 years, but concluding credit quality is good ignores possibly ongoing loan modifications.

See original

Wise words @AdamJJosephson "Banks’ provisions for credit losses have been falling as % of total loans for 2 yrs as have net charge-offs leading some to conclude that credit quality is good even though such analysis ignores what’s happening w/(possibly ongoing) loan modifications"

Reasoning: Fundamentals · Medium term

No-stance mentions (1)
XLF No stance↻ Repost of @alphatrends2026-10-10 04:36 HKTOriginal post ↗

Stock Market Analysis for Week Ending 10/9/26 $SPY $QQQ $IWM $SMH $XBI $MU $NVDA $XLF $TLT #Bitcoin $ALAB $NKE $MAGS

Image 1 ↗

Reasoning: Not tagged by analyst Specific

Fund flows or trade records mentioned in posts reflect only the account’s own claims, are marked “Per the post” and are unverified.

Open the interactive page (with chart)