@Jake__Wujastyk notes $RDDT had a breakout last week.
See original
$RDDT Breakout last week.
Reasoning: Technicals
The Crowd Tape
What the street is doing, not what I think
What top X accounts are doing, not what I think
| Accounts | Bull | Neu | Bear | None |
|---|---|---|---|---|
@ripster47Views › | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
@aleabitoredditViews › | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
@amitisinvestingViews › | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
@Jake__WujastykViews › | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
@alphatrendsViews › | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
@amitisinvesting: Replying to @joshbland123: Was happy to finally get into this one after it fell 50% this year. Referring to the quoted post about buying $RDDT and $SHOP after valuation concerns eased with continued growth.
@ripster47: $RDDT 162s today
Did you listen and buy in 140s?Partly aligned. No clearly opposing views so far.
@alphatrendsViews ›
@alphatrends shares tickers discussed on @TraderTVLive with
@tradertvshawn and
@tradertvneal: $PLTR $AAPL $RDDT $MRVL $CBRS $FSLY $CVNA $NVAX $FHN $PFE. The post itself gives no stance on any of them.
@Jake__WujastykViews ›
@Jake__Wujastyk notes $RDDT had a breakout last week.
@aleabitoredditViews ›
@ripster47Views ›
@amitisinvesting: Replying to @joshbland123: Was happy to finally get into this one after it fell 50% this year. Referring to the quoted post about buying $RDDT and $SHOP after valuation concerns eased with continued growth. (Bullish)
@ripster47: $RDDT 162s today
Did you listen and buy in 140s? (Bullish)
@Jake__Wujastyk notes $RDDT had a breakout last week.
$RDDT Breakout last week.
Reasoning: Technicals
Replying to @joshbland123: Was happy to finally get into this one after it fell 50% this year. Referring to the quoted post about buying $RDDT and $SHOP after valuation concerns eased with continued growth.
@joshbland123 Was happy to finally get into this one after it fell 50% this year
Reasoning: Valuation · Medium term Specific
$RDDT 162s today Did you listen and buy in 140s?
Reasoning: Technicals · Medium term Specific
@alphatrends shares tickers discussed on @TraderTVLive with
@tradertvshawn and
@tradertvneal: $PLTR $AAPL $RDDT $MRVL $CBRS $FSLY $CVNA $NVAX $FHN $PFE. The post itself gives no stance on any of them.
From @TraderTVLive today w
@tradertvshawn and
@tradertvneal
$PLTR $AAPL $RDDT $MRVL $CBRS $FSLY $CVNA $NVAX $FHN $PFE
Reasoning: Not tagged by analyst
Looks like one of you posted on $RDDT WSB… with a $1M $AAOI position. I’m laughing at the comments, even more amusing when my name pops up Might still be early if people think there’s “no moat” in lasers and that AOI makes no money. (wait and see Q2 2027)
Reasoning: Fundamentals · Medium term Specific
Fund flows or trade records mentioned in posts reflect only the account’s own claims, are marked “Per the post” and are unverified.