Beth Kindig believes this bull market has considerably more room to run. However, before the next leg higher begins, a correction is expected that will shake many investors out of the trade, and the main AI proxy $SMH appears to be confirming this view. Mentions $SPY $QQQ.
See original
We believe this bull market has considerably more room to run.
However, before the next leg higher begins, we expect a correction that will shake many investors out of the trade – and the main AI proxy, $SMH, appears to be confirming this view.
https://io-fund.com/broad-market/the-greatest-bull-market-in-decades-correction-first
$SPY $QQQ
Reasoning: Macro
@MrZackMorris replies "$QQQ Yea" to his earlier view wanting a dip to PM low then a pop to PM high on $QQQ, not caring about the rest of the day.
See original
$QQQ Yea
Image 1 ↗
Reasoning: Technicals · Short term
@KobeissiLetter reports that yesterday $NDX, the Semiconductor Index and the S&P 500 Software Index all fell at least 2%, only the second such day in 2026, with the Semiconductor Index on its 4th correction in 135 days, the most since 2002, highlighting extreme volatility in US tech stocks.
See original
Yesterday, the Nasdaq 100, $NDX, the Semiconductor Index, solana:5XqMbyZbtse5UQUzgrYMpeWLWLR6BWFqUm5H3VAWpump, and the S&P 500 Software Index all fell at least -2.0%, marking just the second trading day in 2026 that all three indexes recorded declines of this magnitude.
This follows 4, 5, and 14 such days in 2023, 2024 and 2025, respectively.
By comparison, there were 34 such trading sessions during the 2022 bear market, 48 in 2000 following the Dot-Com Bubble burst, and 37 in 2008 during the Financial Crisis.
Meanwhile, the Semiconductor Index is now experiencing its 4th correction over the last 135 calendar days, its highest number of corrections within any 135-day period since 2002.
US tech stocks are seeing extreme volatility.
Image 1 ↗
Reasoning: Macro
@OddStats: QQQ has drawn down 6% in 7 trading days and VXN just hit its highest in over 2 months.
See original
QQQ has now drawn down -6% in 7 trading days and VXN (VIX for QQQ) just hit its highest point in over 2 months.
Reasoning: Technicals · Short term
The morning flush on $QQQ pays everyday. Just don’t get greedy. I see 50%+ I’m out, per
@MrZackMorris.
See original
The morning flush on $QQQ pays everyday. Just don’t get greedy. I see 50%+ I’m out.
Reasoning: Technicals · Short term Specific
@MrZackMorris premarket Oct 15: $SPY 767.15 (-0.3%), PM range 768.25/764.10; $QQQ 719.63 (-1.3%), PM range 728.40/717.00; ES -0.35%, NQ -1.28%.
See original
1/ Pre-market $SPY / $QQQ — Thu Oct 15 (~9:00 AM ET)
$SPY 767.15 (−0.3% vs 769.60) | PM H/L 768.25 / 764.10
$QQQ 719.63 (−1.3% vs 728.95) | PM H/L 728.40 / 717.00
ES −0.35% | NQ −1.28%
Reasoning: Technicals
No-stance mentions (12)
How often do you see a 2% spread between the $DIA and $QQQ? Not often right?
See original
How often do you see a 2% spread between the $DIA and $QQQ?
Not often right?
@grok help out.
Reasoning: Not tagged by analyst Specific
@RaoulGMI promotes joining R@RealVision for free, highlighting $100k prizes for the Trade Ideas competition. Quoted post from J@Jamie1Coutts discusses the Festival of Trading in 2 days, investment framework, position sizing, and a Pro crypto portfolio outperforming Bitcoin and the Nasdaq through the crypto bear market via selection and sizing.
See original
There is so much value in joining R@RealVision for free including $100k prizes for the Trade Ideas competition. Unfuck your future !
Reasoning: Not tagged by analyst
(Reposted by
@InvestorsLive) I@IUTraders shares a link to their morning broadcast for watchlist prep covering $SPY, $BTC and $QQQ. No market view given.
See original
Morning Broadcast - Watchlist Prep - $SPY $BTC $QQQ https://x.com/i/broadcasts/1mxPaZgANQYKN
Reasoning: Not tagged by analyst
@munster_gene says personalized bots like Muse, Grok Bot and Dot are so sticky that the shift from AI's subsidy phase to its paying phase should be smooth, much like Search. He says that helps explain why $META is up 4% today while the Nasdaq is down 2%, on its new Muse Wonder Bot model that will cost $20 or $100 a month.
See original
Once you've used these personalized bots (Muse, Grok Bot, Dot) the thought of going back to a life without them is painful.
This means the transition from the subsidy phase of AI to the paying phase will be smooth, because once it becomes core to our lives, monetization will appear. Just look at Search.
That reality helps explain why $META is up 4% today, Nasdaq down 2% on the new Muse Wonder Bot model that they will charge $20 or $100 a month.
Reasoning: Fundamentals · Long term Specific
@ripster47 shares Tenet Research's market wake-up summary for October 12, tagging $SPY and $QQQ. The quoted post only lists tickers and gives no view.
See original
Wake Up Summary $SPY $QQQ
Reasoning: Not tagged by analyst
Stock Market Analysis for Week Ending 10/9/26
$SPY $QQQ $IWM $SMH $XBI $MU $NVDA $XLF $TLT #Bitcoin $ALAB $NKE $MAGS
Image 1 ↗
Reasoning: Not tagged by analyst Specific
$QQQ (fib's don't work)
#CTL
https://www.CtheLightTrading.com
Image 1 ↗
Reasoning: Technicals
(
@InvestorsLive 轉發)早盤直播觀察清單:$SPY $BTC $QQQ。
Reasoning: Not tagged by analyst
More than the current Earth economy in USD terms or gold terms?
I ask, b/c Nasdaq is still down 50% from 2000 levels in gold, and 20% from 2021 levels in gold.
Image 1 ↗
Reasoning: Macro Specific
(
@InvestorsLive 轉發)早晨直播觀察名單準備:$SPY $BTC $QQQ。
Reasoning: Not tagged by analyst
💡Trading $SPY $QQQ $SPX $ES $NQ for Living
Learn to Trade Indices & Futures with Ripster Clouds & my concepts for lifetime Consistency. Not everyday is best day , but when Trend Day Comes you hit big
How to Trade
Levels
MTF Clouds
VIX
Amatuer, 10 AM & 10.40 Concepts
Image 1 ↗
Reasoning: Not tagged by analyst
Price at post time (as recorded): $QQQ 757.73
他提到在 Robinhood 峰會上有觀眾以 ARK 表現落後 QQQ 質疑他的資歷。他歡迎這個問題,解釋 $ARKK 與 QQQ 構造不同:QQQ 追蹤納指 100,ARK 主動投資其認為推動顛覆式創新的公司(醫療、金融、交通等),所以持倉、風險都不同。他表示投資人應該與其他選擇比較回報,也要明白自己在買什麼、為什麼買、策略是否適合自己;授權不同不代表不必為表現負責,但是評估表現的重要背景。附有他回應的影片(影片內容未看)。
The original is long; open it to read in full
Reasoning: Not tagged by analyst Per the post
Fund flows or trade records mentioned in posts reflect only the account’s own claims, are marked “Per the post” and are unverified.