@ripster47 highlights $AAOI $NBIS $BE as some top shorts this morning. Notes that no one gets bagged buying dips under his guidance, and those short in the community or following his teachings were prepared via his Monday post on trading a day like today.
See original
$AAOI $NBIS $BE
Some top shorts this morning,
No one gets bagged buying dips under my guidance
Everyone Short in community or those who follow my teachings, I just posted on monday how to trade day like today!
If you are struggling, you can DM me or go through my youtube
Image 1 ↗
Reasoning: Technicals · Short term
$LITE showing ecosystem forming around near-package optics. Open CPX founders include Ciena $CIEN, Coherent $COHR and Marvell $MRVL, alongside others. Publicly traded contributors: Credo $CRDO, Intel $INTC, MaxLinear $MXL, Applied Optoelectronics $AAOI, Astera Labs $ALAB, Amphenol $APH, Keysight $KEYS, TE Connectivity $TEL, VIAVI $VIAV, Lumentum $LITE.
See original
$LITE showing the ecosystem forming around near-package optics.
Open CPX founders include Ciena $CIEN, Coherent $COHR and Marvell $MRVL, alongside Molex, Samtec and TeraHop.
Publicly traded contributors shown here include
Credo $CRDO
Intel $INTC
MaxLinear $MXL
Applied Optoelectronics $AAOI
Astera Labs $ALAB
Amphenol $APH
Keysight $KEYS
TE Connectivity $TEL
VIAVI $VIAV
Lumentum $LITE
NPO reuses the existing pluggable supply chain, making it much easier to scale.
Image 1 ↗
Reasoning: Fundamentals
Replying to W@wnwls1598:
@aleabitoreddit rejects oversupply claims for lasers, noting Chinese pluggable makers bottlenecked at 70-100mW, Cambridge financing scarce capacity, suppliers raising ASPs, and China far from scaling UHP lasers for CPO. Premiums remain for $LITE, $COHR, $SIVE. $LITE lasers sold out into 2029 and negotiating into 2030. CEOs of $LITE and $AAOI see no near-term Chinese impact, with combined capacity still tight for next few years.
See original
What oversupply? Even in the lower end ranges that they're focusing on, Chinese pluggable makers like Innolight are still bottlenecked for 70-100mW ranges from ECOC channel checks.
Cambridge wouldn't be going out financing suppliers with convertible loans for scarce laser capacity.
Suppliers wouldn't be raising ASPs if there was overcapacity. Also not all CW lasers are the same. China is a ways away from from scaling UHP lasers needed for CPO, which is why there's still premiums given to $LITE, $COHR, $SIVE.
$LITE lasers are sold out into 2029 and they're starting negotiations into 2030.
I don't think anyone genuinely believes that China will flood the laser markets medium term, even both $LITE / $AAOI CEO said there was a difference between comments made and what they're actually seeing.
From AOI on China: "of them, they are working maybe 70 mW or very few can really do 100 mW. For 300 mW laser, especially DWDM spec, we don't see that."
"Not in the next two, three years, especially the demand is so big. Okay? Even combined AOI, Lumentum, Coherent, Broadcom all together, it's still very tough to meet the customer demand in the next few years"
From Lumentum last month: "At least at the moment, we see no impact from any Chinese laser supply."
But whenever markets want a correction people just blindly point to China with memory or optics while ignoring what's actually occurring with demand imbalances + LTAs spanning many years and constantly extending.
Reasoning: Fundamentals · Medium term Specific
@aleabitoreddit shares thoughts on AI supply chain, noting strong demand visibility for memory names like $MU, Samsung and SK Hynix into 2030-2031 with LTAs covering 70% of Samsung capacity and price floors. $LITE is sold out into 2029 with discussions into 2030, while $NVDA, $AVGO and $MRVL show supply-constrained growth. Near-term volatility hit options and prices, but long-term baseline from contracts looks solid for bottleneck players. Some caution on $IREN valuation despite Anthropic deal.
See original
Sure... Random train of thoughts on markets now, optics like $LITE / memory + $IREN / Anthropic.
On Memory:
- Demand visibility on $MU / Samsung / SK Hynix extend into 2030-2031.
Samsung has LTAs covering 70% of their capacity into 2031 (likely with SK Hynix type price floors)... and their operating profit is already absurd.
There's a consensus that shortage in 2027 will be much more severe than 2026... Even $SNDK expends gross margins to exceed 80% entering 2030.
You're going to hear Acer and other CEOs that want memory prices to go down cite bear cases like CXMT/YMTC, and Chinese players.
But just looking at supply procurement that $NVDA is doing + hyperscalers, demand visibility is absurd for the next 5 years. And by that time, cumulative FCF coming in from these take/pay + pricing floor contracts might exceed some of their entire marketcaps so it feels like there's some baseline.
Near-term is always volatile (IV dropped a ton across $EWY to $DRAM to $MU), so people with call options likely got nuked, along with underlying prices.
But if Samsung is 3x 2027E, has 5 year LTAs with 70% of capacity committed from hyperscalers, and price floors, it's kinda hard to see these names suffer a sustained crash...
For optics:
- $LITE is literally sold out into 2029, starting discussions into 2030. With demand visibility lasting into 2031… with hyperscalers largely funding the capacity buildout.
Their 2028 Greensboro fab expansion was ~$5B in UHP laser capac
Reasoning: Fundamentals · Long term Specific
@kevinxu says he "narrowly avoided disaster", quoting his earlier post about selling $AAOI for +4% while already up +2% on a new swing, implying the stock dropped after he sold.
See original
narrowly avoided disaster
Image 1 ↗
Reasoning: Sentiment · Short term Specific
Replying to C@CKCapitalxx:
@kevinxu says he is glad he sold $AAOI on Friday, linking his post about selling it for +4%.
See original
C@CKCapitalxx glad i sold on friday! https://x.com/kevinxu/status/2108622475873698253?s=20
Reasoning: Sentiment · Short term Specific
Fund flows or trade records mentioned in posts reflect only the account’s own claims, are marked “Per the post” and are unverified.