@firstadopter: plummeting smartphone sales are bad for Qualcomm, as Counterpoint says global shipments fell 20% YoY in Q3 2026, the lowest Q3 since 2012.
See original
It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that plummeting consumer smartphone sales is bad for Qualcomm.
Reasoning: Fundamentals · Medium term
(Reposted by
@ripster47) Trade recap on $QCOM: long setup on 1 HR MTF (34/50 EMA Cloud), added right at open and closed at the bell for a $5/share profit. Market not great for swings, mostly day trading.
See original
Trade Recaps 10/13/26 been busy with work lately not able to post much recaps, plus not a great market for swing! mostly day trading and holding only if have good cushion https://tenettradegroup.com/ttg/RGV/
SETUP: 1 HR MTF (34/50 EMA Cloud) long!
$QCOM Daily nice chart
-->Added right at open closed the trade at the bell for a $5/share profit!
guidance
@TENETTRADEGROUP
@ripster47
Image 1 ↗ Image 2 ↗
Reasoning: Technicals Specific
$QCOM just won a jury verdict in its licensing dispute with $ARM with a 5-year royalty clause potentially worth ~$1.5B still awaiting judge’s decision. Qualcomm is one of Arm’s biggest customers so the outcome could shape future licensing agreements as Arm expands beyond chip designs into selling its own silicon.
See original
$QCOM just won a jury verdict in its licensing dispute with $ARM with a 5-year royalty clause potentially worth ~$1.5B still awaiting judge’s decision.
Qualcomm is one of Arm’s biggest customers so the outcome could shape future licensing agreements as Arm expands beyond chip designs into selling its own silicon.
Image 1 ↗ Image 2 ↗
Reasoning: Catalyst · Medium term Specific
@ripster47 reports Qualcomm $QCOM won a jury verdict against Arm $ARM; a verdict against Arm in the ongoing trial could cost Arm up to $2.2 billion in lost royalty payments.
See original
$QCOM $ARM
QCOM ARM -- QCOM wins jury verdict against ARM
A verdict against Arm in its ongoing trial with Qualcomm could cost the company up to $2.2 billion in lost royalty payments.
Reasoning: Catalyst · Medium term Specific
@michaelsikand highlights futuristic tailwinds for $QCOM including on-device 100B parameter models, wearables, robotics and data center that the market is not pricing in. $AMZN in at $160 creates a defensible floor. Calls it an asymmetrical bet.
See original
$QCOM: So many futurisitc tailwinds for this name the market is giving no credit for like 100B parameter models on device, wearables, robotics, data center.
$AMZN in at $160 creates a defensible floor.
Asymmetrical bet.
Image 1 ↗
Reasoning: Fundamentals · Medium term Specific
$QCOM CFO ON DATA CENTER AMBITIONS
“$50B. There’s no reason why we’re not going to get the number.”
Image 1 ↗ Image 2 ↗
Reasoning: Fundamentals Specific
Fund flows or trade records mentioned in posts reflect only the account’s own claims, are marked “Per the post” and are unverified.